Method and system for non-invasive optical blood glucose detection utilizing spectral data analysis

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are disclosed for non-invasively measuring blood glucose levels in a biological sample based on spectral data. This includes at least one light source configured to strike a target area of a sample, at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, positioned to receive light from the at least one light source and to generate an output signal, having a time dependent current, which is indicative of the power of light detected, and a processor configured to receive the output signal from the at least one light detector and based on the received output signal, calculate the attenuance attributable to blood in a sample present in the target area and eliminate effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector, and based on the calculated attenuance, determine a blood glucose level associated with a sample.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/425,535, filed Apr. 17, 2009, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/055,303, filed on May 22, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, and also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/089,152, filed on Aug. 15, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Diabetes is a chronic disease that, when not controlled, over time leads to serious damage to many of the body's systems, including the nerves, blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and heart. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) estimates that 23.6 million people, or 7.8 percent of the population in the United States, had diabetes in 2007. Globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 180 million people have diabetes, a number they expect to increase to 366 million by 2030, with 30.3 million in the United States. According to the WHO, an estimated 1.1 million people died from diabetes in 2005. They project that diabetes deaths will increase by more than 50% between 2006 and 2015 overall and by more than 80% in upper-middle income countries.

The economic burden from diabetes for individuals and society as a whole is substantial. According to the American Diabetes Association, the total annual economic cost of diabetes was estimated to be $174 billion in the United States in 2007. This is an increase of $42 billion since 2002. This 32% increase means the dollar amount has risen over $8 billion more each year.

A vital element of diabetes management is the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) concentration by diabetics in the home environment. By testing blood glucose levels often, diabetics can better manage medication, diet, and exercise to maintain control and prevent the long-term negative health outcomes. In fact, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), which followed 1,441 diabetics for several years, showed that those following an intensive-control program with multiple blood sugar tests each day, as compared with the standard-treatment group, had only one-fourth as many people develop diabetic eye disease, half as many develop kidney disease, one-third as many develop nerve disease, and far fewer people who already had early forms of these three complications got worse.

However, current monitoring techniques discourage regular use due to the inconvenient and painful nature of drawing blood through the skin prior to analysis, which causes many diabetics to not be as diligent as they should be for good blood glucose control. As a result, non-invasive measurement of glucose concentration is a desirable and beneficial development for the management of diabetes. A non-invasive monitor will make testing multiple times each day pain-free and more palatable for children with diabetes. According to a study published in 2005 (J. Wagner, C. Malchoff, and G. Abbott, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 7(4) 2005, 612-619), people with diabetes would perform SMBG more frequently and have improved quality of life with a non-invasive blood glucose monitoring device.

There exist a number of non-invasive approaches for blood glucose determination. One technique of non-invasive blood chemical detection involves collecting and analyzing light spectra data.

Extracting information about blood characteristics, such as glucose concentration from spectral or other data obtained from spectroscopy, is a complex problem due to the presence of components (e.g., skin, fat, muscle, bone, interstitial fluid) other than blood in the area that is being sensed. Such other components can influence these signals in such a way as to alter the reading. In particular, the resulting signal may be much larger in magnitude than the portion of the signal that corresponds to blood, and therefore limits the ability to accurately extract blood characteristics information.

The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In an aspect of the present invention, a system for detecting glucose in a biological sample is disclosed. This system includes at least one light source configured to strike a target area of a sample, at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, positioned to receive light from the at least one light source and to generate an output signal, having a time dependent current, which is indicative of the power of light detected, and a processor configured to receive the output signal from the at least one light detector and based on the received output signal, calculate the attenuance attributable to blood in a sample present in the target area and eliminate effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector, and based on the calculated attenuance, determine a blood glucose level associated with a sample present in the target area.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for detecting glucose in a biological sample is disclosed. The method includes utilizing at least one light source configured to strike a target area of a sample utilizing at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, positioned to receive light from the at least one light source and generating an output signal, having a time dependent current, which is indicative of the power of light detected, and utilizing a processor that receives the output signal from the at least one light detector and based on the received output signal, calculating the attenuance attributable to blood in a sample present in the target area and eliminating effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector, and based on the calculated attenuance, determining a blood glucose level associated with a sample present in the target area.

These are merely some of the innumerable aspects of the present invention and should not be deemed an all-inclusive listing of the innumerable aspects associated with the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the present invention, reference may be made to accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a plot of a pulse wave corresponding to light absorption of arterial blood, according to exemplary embodiments;

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary system for obtaining spectral data;

FIG. 3 illustrates a plot of A(t), calculated according to Equation (9) using data in FIG. 1; and

FIG. 4 is a basic illustrative schematic of a preamplifier circuit that converts photocurrent into voltage prior to digitization.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description, numerous exemplary specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details, or with various modifications of the details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.

Optical spectroscopy can be used to determine the amount of light absorbed and scattered, i.e., attenuated, by a biological sample such as a human finger. By measuring the amount of light absorbed by the sample, it is possible to determine glucose, cholesterol, and hemoglobin levels of a subject non-invasively. Fingertip measurements are usually preferred because of the large concentration of capillaries in the fingertip and because of the conversion of arterial blood into venous blood that occurs in the fingertip. However, the techniques of the present invention are not limited to use with a fingertip. For example, the biological sample could be a human earlobe.

When light is transmitted through a biological sample, such as a human finger, the light is attenuated by various components of the finger including skin, muscle, bone, fat, interstitial fluid and blood. It has been observed, however, that light attenuation by a human finger exhibits a small cyclic pattern that corresponds to a heartbeat. It is believed that this cyclic pattern will be present in measurements of many other human body parts, the earlobe being one of many examples.

FIG. 1 depicts a plot 102 of a detector photocurrent, I_(D)(t), that corresponds to the power of light received by a detector after the light has passed through a subject's finger. As can be seen, the detector photocurrent exhibits a cyclic pattern. This cyclic pattern is due to the subject's heartbeat, which cyclically increases and decreases the quantity of blood in the subject's capillaries (or other structures). Although the magnitude of the cyclic pattern is small in comparison to the total photocurrent generated by the detector, considerable information can be extracted from the cyclic pattern of the plot 102. For example, assuming that the person's heart rate is sixty beats per minute, the time between the start of any pulse beat and the end of that pulse beat is one second. During this one-second period, the photocurrent will have a maximum or peak reading 104 and minimum or valley reading 106. The peak reading 104 of the plot corresponds to when there is a minimum amount of blood in the capillaries, and the valley reading 106 corresponds to when there is a maximum amount of blood in the capillaries. By using information provided by the peak and valley of the cyclic plot, the optical absorption and scattering by major finger constituents that are not in the capillaries, such as skin, fat, bones, muscle and interstitial fluids, are excluded. These major constituents that are not in the capillaries are excluded because they are not likely to change during the time interval of one heartbeat. In other words, the light that is absorbed and scattered, i.e., attenuated, by the blood can be detected based on the peaks and valleys of the plot 102.

Assuming that the peak of the cyclic photocurrent generated by the light-sensing device is I_(P), the adjacent valley of the cyclic photocurrent is I_(V), and the photocurrent generated by the light-sensing device without a human finger is I₀, the transmittances corresponding to the peak and valley photocurrents can be defined as:

$\begin{matrix} {{T_{V} = \frac{I_{V}}{I_{0}}}{and}} & (1) \\ {T_{P} = \frac{I_{P}}{I_{0}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

The corresponding peak and valley absorbance are:

A _(V)=−log(T _(V))  (3)

and

A _(P)=−log(T _(P))  (4)

The difference between A_(V) and A_(P) represents the light absorption and scattering by the blood in the finger, excluding non-blood constituents:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; A} = {{A_{V} - A_{P}} = {\log \left( \frac{I_{P}}{I_{V}} \right)}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

As can be seen in the algorithm shown in Equation (5), ΔA does not depend on I₀. Thus, calculating ΔA does not require a determination of the current generated by the light-sensing device without a sample. Monitoring the photocurrent corresponding to light power transmitted through a sample is sufficient to calculate ΔA.

FIG. 2 depicts a simplified block diagram of an exemplary apparatus for use in an exemplary embodiment. Optical measurement system, which is generally indicated by numeral 200, uses the “pulsatile” concept for determining an amount of light absorbed and scattered solely by the blood in a sample (a human finger in this exemplary embodiment). A power source 201, such as a battery, provides power to a light source 202 that generates a plurality of light beams 204, 206, 208, 210 that are directed toward the top of the finger of a subject. In an exemplary embodiment, each of the light beams 204, 206, 208, 210 have the same wavelength or a different wavelength range, typically within 800 nm to 1600 nm. Although the optical measurement system 200 is described herein as generating four (4) light beams, it is contemplated that the light source 202 can be altered to generate fewer light beams or additional light beams in other embodiments.

A first aperture 212 ensures that the light beams 204, 206, 208, 210 strike a target area of the finger. A second aperture 214 ensures that the portion of the light beams that are transmitted through the finger strike a lens 216. Light beams 204, 206, 208, 210 are attenuated by the finger and components of the optical measurement system 200, and, thus, attenuated light beams 218, 220, 222, 224 are emitted from the finger. The attenuated light beams 218, 220, 222, 224 strike the lens 216, and the lens 216 collects the attenuated light beams 218, 220, 222, 224 so that they impinge more efficiently on a detector block 226.

The detector block 226 is positioned directly under the lens 216 and comprises a plurality of light-sensing devices (LSD) 228, 230, 232, 234 such as an array of photodiodes. According to one aspect of the optical measurement system 200, each of the light-sensing devices 228, 230, 232, 234 detects a specific wavelength of light as defined by corresponding interference filters (IF) 236, 238, 240, 242, respectively. The interference filter transmits one or more spectral bands or lines of light, and blocks others.

Each of the light-sensing devices 228, 230, 232, 234 generates a corresponding photocurrent signal that is proportional to the power of the light received by the particular light sensing device. The photocurrent signal generated by the photodiode can be converted to another form of signal, such as an analog voltage signal or a digital signal. A processor 243 is coupled to the detector block 226 and is configured to calculate the change of photocurrent signals 244, 246, 248, 250.

According to one aspect, the processor 243 executes an algorithm such as shown in the Equation (5) to calculate the change in the light absorption (ΔA) solely caused by the blood in the finger. Thereafter, this quantitative calculation of light absorption of the blood can be used to determine a characteristic of the blood. For example, by comparing the calculated light absorption value to predetermined values corresponding to different glucose levels stored in a memory (not shown), a blood-glucose level of the subject can be determined.

A difficulty associated with the finger based pulsatile detection methodology is low signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, because the amplitude of cyclic pattern (i.e., the difference between peak and valley) is typically 1%-2% of the total photocurrent generated by the light power transmitted through the finger. To obtain a S/N ratio of 100:1 in the determination of ΔA, the baseline noise of the device being used to measure the light absorption by the finger should not be larger than 3.0×10⁻⁵ in absorbance (peak to peak), within a 10 Hz bandwidth.

However, a 3.0×10⁻⁵ absorbance (peak to peak) baseline noise level within a 10 Hz bandwidth is difficult to obtain with the low light power levels that are used by some battery-powered hand held non-invasive blood chemical measurement devices. One solution involves data averaging. To increase the S/N ratio, the averaged value of ΔA, as defined by the Equation below, is used in further calculation to extract blood glucose concentration:

$\begin{matrix} {\overset{\_}{\Delta \; A} = {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{M}\; {\Delta \; A_{j}}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

In Equation (6), M is the number of heartbeats during the time interval of the pulsatile measurement. However, this approach requires long data acquisition time, due to the fact that the rate of heartbeat is in the order of one per second. For example, 25 seconds would be needed for increasing the S/N ratio by a factor of five, and 100 seconds would be needed for increasing the S/N ratio by a factor of ten. In comparison, current commercial blood drawing glucose meters can determine blood glucose level within 5 seconds. Furthermore, long detection time will significantly increase measurement errors due to finger movement, light power drift, device temperature change, etc. Thus, there is a need for new techniques to measure blood glucose levels quickly and accurately.

Improving S/N Ratio by Standard Deviation

The time dependent detector photocurrent output, I_(D)(t), shown in FIG. 1 can be expressed as the sum of a small time dependent cyclic photocurrent ΔI(t), corresponding to the heartbeat, a noise current n(t), and a constant baseline photocurrent I_(B):

I _(D)(t)=I _(B) +ΔI(t)+n(t)  (7)

The above Equation can be re-arranged as:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{I_{D}(t)}{I_{B}} = {1 + \frac{{\Delta \; {I(t)}} + {n(t)}}{I_{B}}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

Applying common logarithm to both side of the Equation (8), one obtains:

$\begin{matrix} {{A(t)} = {{\log \left\lbrack \frac{I_{D}(t)}{I_{B}} \right\rbrack} = {\log \left( {1 + \frac{{\Delta \; {I(t)}} + {n(t)}}{I_{B}}} \right)}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

FIG. 3, which is generally indicated by numeral 300, shows a typical A(t) plot 302, calculated according to Equation (9) using data in FIG. 1. For a pulse function A(t) shown in FIG. 3, the following key relationship exists during the time interval of one heartbeat:

σ[A(t)]=kΔA  (10)

in which σ[A(t)] is the Standard Deviation of A(t), and k is a proportional constant.

Considering the fact that I_(B) is a constant and σ²(log I_(B))=0, one obtains:

σ[A(t)]=σ[log I _(D)(t)]  (12)

Therefore, the peak-to-valley height of the A(t) plot during the time interval of one heartbeat can be obtained directly from the standard deviation of the logarithm of I_(D)(t):

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; A} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {A(t)} \right\rbrack}{k} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{k}}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

A major advantage of Equation (13) is that high S/N ratio can be achieved within short data acquisition time (approximately one second), as explained below.

In a finger based pulsatile measurement depicted by FIG. 2, the value of the sum, ΔI(t)+n(t) is typically less than 2% of the large constant baseline photocurrent I_(B). Therefore, Equation (9) can be approximated as:

$\begin{matrix} {{A(t)} = {{\log \left\lbrack \frac{I_{D}(t)}{I_{B}} \right\rbrack} \approx {\frac{1}{\ln \; 10}\frac{{\Delta \; {I(t)}} + {n(t)}}{I_{B}}}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

Similarly, the standard deviation of A(t) can be approximated as:

$\begin{matrix} {{\sigma \left\lbrack {A(t)} \right\rbrack} \approx {\frac{1}{\ln \; 10}\frac{\sqrt{{\sigma^{2}\left\lbrack {\Delta \; {I(t)}} \right\rbrack} + {\sigma^{2}\left\lbrack {n(t)} \right\rbrack}}}{I_{B}}}} & (15) \end{matrix}$

Equation (15) demonstrates great noise reduction power of Equation (13). For example, for a relatively high baseline noise with the ratio

${\rho = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {n(t)} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; \Delta \; {I(t)}} \right\rbrack} = {0.1\left( {{or}\mspace{14mu} 10\%} \right)}}},$

the contribution to σ[A(t)] from the baseline noise n(t) is estimated to be less than 0.005 (or 0.5%), corresponding to an increase in S/N ratio by a factor of 20 without increasing detection time. As such, dramatic noise reduction can be obtained without increasing the data acquisition time, and a finger based pulsatile measurement can be completed within the time interval of one heartbeat (which is approximately one second), and the requirement for the S/N ratio of 100 to 1 in determination of ΔA can be satisfied using an optical system with a baseline noise of about 6.0×10⁻⁴ absorbance (peak to peak) within a 10 Hz bandwidth. It should be pointed out that when the baseline noise of an optical system is dominated by shot noise due to low light illumination power, a noise reduction by a factor of 20 equals an increasing in light illumination power by a factor of 20²=400.

This ability of obtaining higher S/N ratio within the very short data acquisition time, e.g., less than one second, will significantly reduce detection error caused by factors such as finger movement, temperature change, and light power drift during the measurement, and therefore dramatically improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the pulsatile detection methodology.

Furthermore, the value of k does not change with wavelength, because transmitted lights at all wavelengths have identical pulse shape due to the heartbeat. As a result, the constant k will be cancelled in data normalization discussed in next section, and σ[log I_(D)(t)] will be used in further regression analysis to establish correlation between the optical measurement and blood glucose level. This will greatly simplify the data analysis process since σ[log I_(D)(t)] involves only two standard math functions available in most popular spreadsheet programs such as Microsoft EXCEL®. EXCEL® is a federally registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation, having a place of business at One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Wash. 98052-6399.

Normalization

At each wavelength λ_(i), the absorption ΔA(λ_(i)) is linked to the increase of amount of blood (ΔB) in the optical sensing area of the fingertip due to the heartbeat by the following Equation:

ΔA(λ_(i))=ε(C,λ _(i) ,T)ΔB  (16)

in which ε(C,λ_(i),T) is the absorption/scattering coefficient of blood at wavelength λ_(i), finger temperature T, and blood glucose concentration C. It is well understood that the variable ΔB differs from person to person, and may even change from day to day for the same person.

The uncertainty from the variable ΔB can be cancelled by introducing the normalization factor Q_(i)(C,T) at each wavelength λ_(i), as defined by the Equation below:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}}} = \frac{ɛ\left( {C,\lambda_{i},T} \right)}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {ɛ\left( {C,\lambda_{i},T} \right)}}}},} & (17) \end{matrix}$

in which N is total number of wavelength employed. Preferably, N typically ranges from twenty to thirty.

Based on Equations (13) and (17), Q_(i)(C,T) is linked to the detector photocurrent at each wavelength λ_(i), I_(D)(λ_(i),t), by the following Equation:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}}} = {\frac{{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{i},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}/k}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{i},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}/k}} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{i},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{i},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}}}},} & (18) \end{matrix}$

As shown by Equation (18), the constant k is cancelled and σ[log I_(D)(t)] will be used in further regression analysis to establish correlation between the optical measurement and blood glucose level. This is possible because data are taken simultaneously from all detection channels.

A correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose concentration can be established according to the following Equation:

$\begin{matrix} {C_{optical} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {{a_{i}(T)}{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)}}}} & (19) \end{matrix}$

in which C_(optical) is the blood glucose concentration predicted by the optical measurement, Q_(i)(C,T) is defined by Equations (17) and (18), and a_(i)(T) is the temperature dependent regression coefficient corresponding to wavelength λ_(i). The values of a_(i)(T) can be extracted using proper statistics methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Equation (19) represents ideal cases when large number of calibrations can be made at different finger temperatures. In reality, frequently only a limited number of calibrations can be made (e.g., 15 to 20), and each may be taken at a different finger temperature. Under this condition, the finger temperature can be treated as an independent variable, and the above Equation can be approximated as:

$\begin{matrix} {C_{optical} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {b_{i}{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)}}} + {\eta \; T}}} & (20) \end{matrix}$

in which b_(i) is the temperature independent regression coefficient corresponding to wavelength λ_(i), and η is the regression coefficient for the finger temperature. The values of b_(i) and that of η can be extracted using proper statistics methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Ratio Methodology

Alternatively, the uncertainty from the variable ΔB can be cancelled by introducing a ratio factor Y_(ij) at wavelength λ_(i):

$\begin{matrix} {{{Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{i} \right)}}{\Delta \; {A\left( \lambda_{j} \right)}} = {\frac{ɛ\left( {C,\lambda_{i},T} \right)}{ɛ\left( {C,\lambda_{j},T} \right)} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{i},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {I_{D}\left( {\lambda_{j},t} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}}},} & (21) \end{matrix}$

in which j can be any number from 1 to N, assuming that the device collects signal at all N wavelengths.

Similar to the normalization algorithm discussed before, a correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose level can be established according to the following Equation:

$\begin{matrix} {C_{optical} = {\sum\limits_{i \neq j}^{N}\; {{f_{i}(T)}{Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)}}}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

in which C_(optical) is the blood glucose concentration predicted by the optical measurement, Y_(ij)(C,T) is defined by Equation (21), and f_(i)(T) is the temperature dependent regression coefficient corresponding to wavelength λ_(i). The value of f_(i)(T) can be obtained using statistics methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Equation (22) represents ideal cases when large number of calibration can be made at different finger temperatures. In reality, frequently only limited number of calibration can be made (e.g., 15 to 20), and each may be taken at a different finger temperature. Under this condition, the finger temperature can be treated as an independent variable, and the above Equation can be approximated as:

$\begin{matrix} {C_{optical} = {{\sum\limits_{i \neq j}^{N}\; {h_{i}{Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)}}} + {\beta \; T}}} & (23) \end{matrix}$

in which h_(i) is the temperature independent regression coefficient corresponding to wavelength λ_(i), and β is the regression coefficient for the finger temperature. The values of h_(i) and that of β can be extracted using proper statistics methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Elimination of the Effect of Temperature Dependent Device Response

It is well understood that the detector sensitivity of a silicon photodiode detector is a function of wavelength and temperature. For the device configuration shown in FIG. 2, which is generally indicated by numeral 200, the light power received by ith silicon diode detector, corresponding to wavelength λ_(i), is converted into a photocurrent according to the following Equation:

I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)=P(λ_(i) ,t)S ₀(λ_(i))[1+γ(λ_(i))(T _(Di)(t)−25° C.)]  (24)

In the above Equation (24), P(λ_(i),t) is the light power received by the detector, S₀(λ_(i)) is the photosensitivity of the detector at wavelength λ_(i) and 25° C., γ(λ_(i)) is the temperature coefficient of the photosensitivity at wavelength λ_(i), and T_(Di)(t) is the temperature of ith photodiode detector. The temperature coefficient γ(λ_(i)) varies with the wavelength. For example, for Hamamatsu S 1337 series photodiode detectors, γ(λ_(i)) ranges from near zero at 900 nm to over 1.0%/° C. at 1100 nm. This imposes a potential problem for the device configuration show in FIG. 2, because it is very difficult to keep temperature of each individual diode detector constant in a handheld device used by a person with diabetes under a normal household/office environment.

This uncertainty due to the detector temperature T_(Di)(t) can be eliminated using the algorithm shown by Equations (12) and (13). Applying common logarithm on both sides of the Equation (24), one obtains:

log I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)=log P(λ_(i) ,t)+log S ₀(λ_(i))+log [1+γ(λ_(i))(T _(Di)(t)−25° C.)]  (25)

Considering the fact that S₀(λ_(i)) is a constant and that detector temperature T_(Di)(t) remains almost constant during the very short data acquisition time interval of approximately one second, one obtains:

σ[log I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)]=σ[log P(λ_(i,) t)]  (26)

As such, the uncertainty caused by detector temperature T_(Di)(t) is eliminated by the use of this standard deviation methodology.

Voltage Detection Mode

In the device configuration shown in FIG. 2, the photocurrent of ith photodiode detector I_(D)(λ_(i),t) is typically converted into a voltage using a preamplifier before digitization. FIG. 4 shows the schematic circuit diagram of a typical preamplifier, which is generally indicated by numeral 400.

The output voltage 412 of ith preamplifier 400, in coupling with ith photodiode detector 408, can be expressed as:

V _(i)(t)=R _(i) I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)=R _(0i)[1+χ_(i)(T _(Ri)(t)−25° C.)]I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)  (27)

In the above Equation (27), R_(0i) is the resistance value of feedback resistor 402 for ith preamplifier at 25° C., χ_(i) is the temperature coefficient of the resistor, and T_(Ri)(t) is the temperature of the resistor. Applying common logarithm to both side of the Equation (27), one obtains:

log V _(i)(t)=log R _(0i)+log [1+χ_(i)(T _(Ri)(t)−25° C.)]+log I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)  (28)

Considering the fact that R_(0i) is a constant and that the resistor temperature T_(Ri)(t) does not change during the very short data acquisition time interval of approximately one second, one obtains:

σ[log V _(i)(t)]=σ[log I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)]  (29)

Substituting Equation (26) into Equation (29), one obtains:

σ[log V _(i)(t)]=σ[log P(λ_(i) ,t)]  (30)

As such, the uncertainty caused by resistor temperature T_(R)(t) is eliminated.

Under the voltage detection mode, the normalization factor in Equation (18) can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} {{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}}} & (31) \end{matrix}$

The mathematic correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose concentration can then be established according to Equation (19) or Equation (20), under corresponding calibration conditions.

Similarly, the ratio factor defined by Equation (21) can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} {{Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{j}(t)}} \right\rbrack}} & (32) \end{matrix}$

The mathematic correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose concentration can then be established according to Equation (22) or Equation (23), under corresponding calibration conditions. The schematic circuit diagram of a typical preamplifier 400 also includes a feedback capacitor 404, an operational amplifier 406, and a ground connection 410.

Digitization

The voltage output 412 from the preamplifier 400 is usually digitized using an analog-to-digital convertor (ADC). The digitized signal is then sent to a computer for data analysis. The output of ith ADC, in communication with ith preamplifier that is in coupling with ith photodiode 408 collecting light power at wavelength λ_(i), can be expressed by the following Equation:

(ADC)_(i)=(ADC)_(0i) +G _(i) {└I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)+I _(Dark,i) ┘R _(i) +A _(0i)}  (33)

In the above Equation (33), (ADC)_(0i) is the offset of ith ADC, G_(i) is the nominal ADC Gain used during the detection, I_(D)(λ_(i),t) is the photocurrent of ith photodiode detector, I_(Dark,i) is the dark current of ith photodiode detector, R_(i)=R_(0i)[1+χ_(i)(T_(Ri)(t)−25° C.)]] is the resistance of feedback resistor of ith preamplifier, and A_(0i) is the offset of ith preamplifier.

The contribution of the three factors, (ADC)_(0i), I_(Dark,i), and A_(0i) can be removed by carrying out a dark measurement with the light source turned off right before or after the corresponding finger measurement. When the light source is turned off, the above Equation (33) becomes:

(ADC)_(Dark,i) (ADC)_(0i) +G _(i)(I _(Dark,i) R _(i) +A ₀₁)  (34)

The difference between the two above Equations (33) and (34) reflects ADC output corresponding to the photocurrent:

Δ(ADC)_(i)=(ADC)_(i)−(ADC)_(Dark,i) =G _(i) I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)R_(i)  (35)

Applying common logarithm to both side of the Equation (35), one obtains:

log Δ(ADC)_(i)=log G _(i)+log I_(D)(λ_(i) ,t)+log R _(i)  (36)

G_(i) and R_(i) can be considered as constants as long as the time interval between the finger measurement and the dark measurement is short. As such, one obtains:

σ[log Δ(ADC)_(i)]=σ[log I _(D)(λ_(i) ,t)]  (37)

Substituting Equation (26) into Equation (37), one further obtains:

σ[log Δ(ADC)_(i)]=σ[log P(λ_(i) ,t)]  (38)

Based on Equation (37), the normalization factor defined by Equation (18) can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} {{Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}}} & (39) \end{matrix}$

The mathematic correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose concentration can then be established according to Equation (19) or (20), under corresponding calibration conditions.

Similar to normalization, the ratio factor defined by Equation (21) can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} {{Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = \frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{j}} \right\rbrack}} & (40) \end{matrix}$

The correlation between optical measurement and blood glucose concentration can then be established according to Equations (22) or (23), under corresponding calibration conditions.

Thus, there has been shown and described several embodiments of a novel invention. As is evident from the foregoing description, certain aspects of the present invention are not limited by the particular details of the examples illustrated herein, and it is therefore contemplated that other modifications and applications, or equivalents thereof, will occur to those skilled in the art. The terms “have,” “having,” “includes,” “including,” and similar terms as used in the foregoing specification are used in the sense of “optional” or “may include” and not as “required.” Many changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications of the present construction will, however, become apparent to those skilled in the art after considering the specification and the accompanying drawings. All such changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications, which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention, are deemed to be covered by the invention, which is limited only by the claims that follow. It should be understood that the embodiments disclosed herein include any and all combinations of features described in any of the dependent claims. 

1. A system for detecting glucose in a biological sample, comprising: at least one light source configured to strike a target area of a sample; at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, positioned to receive light from the at least one light source and to generate an output signal, having a time dependent current, which is indicative of the power of light detected; and a processor configured to receive the output signal from the at least one light detector and based on the received output signal, calculate the attenuance attributable to blood in a sample present in the target area and eliminate effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector, and based on the calculated attenuance, determine a blood glucose level associated with a sample present in the target area.
 2. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to eliminate the effect of uncertainty caused by temperature of the at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, by calculating the standard deviation of the logarithm of the time dependent voltage signal with the processor.
 3. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to calculate a normalization factor Q_(i)(C,T) based on the preamplifier output voltage V_(i)(t) as a function of time and standard deviation σ according to the ${Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}}.}$
 4. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to calculate a ratio factor Y_(ij)(C,T) based on the preamplifier output voltage V_(i)(t) as a function of time and standard deviation σ according to the equation: ${Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{j}(t)}} \right\rbrack}.}$
 5. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 1, further comprising an analog-to-digital convertor having a digitized voltage output.
 6. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 5, wherein the processor is configured to calculate a normalization factor Q_(i)(C,T) based on the analog-to-digital convertor voltage output Δ(ADC)_(i), where σ is standard deviation according to ${Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}}.}$
 7. The system for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 5, wherein the processor is configured to calculate a ratio factor Y_(ij)(C,T) based on the analog-to-digital convertor voltage output Δ(ADC)_(i), where σ is standard deviation according to the equation: ${Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{j}} \right\rbrack}.}$
 8. A method for detecting glucose in a biological sample, comprising: utilizing at least one light source configured to strike a target area of a sample; utilizing at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, positioned to receive light from the at least one light source and generating an output signal, having a time dependent current, which is indicative of the power of light detected; receiving the output signal from the at least one light detector with a processor and based on the received output signal; calculating the attenuance attributable to blood in a sample present in the target area with the processor; eliminating effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector with the processor; and determining a blood glucose level associated with a sample present in the target area based on the calculated attenuance with the processor.
 9. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 8, wherein the step of eliminating effect of uncertainty caused by temperature dependent detector response of the at least one light detector, which includes a preamplifier having a feedback resistor, with the processor further includes calculating the standard deviation of the logarithm of the time dependent voltage signal with the processor.
 10. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 8, further comprising calculating a normalization factor Q_(i)(C,T) based on the preamplifier output voltage V_(i)(t) as a function of time and standard deviation σ according to the equation: ${Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}}.}$
 11. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 8, further comprising calculating a ratio factor Y_(ij)(C,T) based on the preamplifier output voltage V_(i)(t) as a function of time and standard deviation σ according to the equation: ${Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{i}(t)}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {V_{j}(t)}} \right\rbrack}.}$
 12. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 8, further comprising utilizing an analog-to-digital convertor having a digitized voltage output.
 13. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 12, further comprising calculating a normalization factor Q_(i)(C,T) based on the analog-to-digital convertor voltage output Δ(ADC)_(i), where σ is standard deviation according to the equation: ${Q_{i}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; {\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}}.}$
 14. The method for detecting glucose in a biological sample according to claim 12, further comprising calculating a ratio factor Y_(ij)(C,T) based on the analog-to-digital convertor voltage output Δ(ADC)_(i), where σ is standard deviation according to the equation: ${Y_{ij}\left( {C,T} \right)} = {\frac{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{i}} \right\rbrack}{\sigma \left\lbrack {\log \; {\Delta ({ADC})}_{j}} \right\rbrack}.}$ 